Compare popular login controllers for Kubernetes and set the top consideration to choose the right controller for you. Even though Kubernetes was originally released in June 2014, you might be surprised that Fire Ingress Kubernetes remains in Kubernetes v1.18 beta. If you are looking for the best kuberenetes ingress controller visit https://kubevious.io/blog/post/comparing-top-ingress-controllers-for-kubernetes/.
From launching to Beta in early 2016 (Kubernetes v1.2), Fire Ingress’ has been very focused on portability and has been relatively light during this time. Recently, Christopher Luciano from IBM and Bowie DU from Google presented “the development of Ingress Kubernetes API for GA and around” in Kubecon North America 2019 and described various increased fire (eg better road adaptation, new ingress class resources).
With Ingress Fire, because it migrated to GA in version 1.19, I have gathered the general comparison of the popular ingress controllers available and some important decision considerations.
Ingress Vs Ingress Controller
Before exploring various Ingress controllers, let’s look quickly at what Kubernetes was entered and what the controller was doing.
To make some application functions available, Kubernetes offers three types of services:
Cluster: Add the final point of internal communication to the cluster
Node port: Provides a static port on each node to forward external calls to internal services
LoadBalancer: Make an external load balancer to route external demand to internal services
Even though Ingress is not a Kubernetes service, it can also be used to expose services to external requests.
The advantage of the entry of load balancer or node port is that the entry can combine the rule of routing to a single resource to expose some services.